Durchschaut - Das Geheimnis, kleine und große Luegen zu entlarven

reflex ; Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1927.
    Podlesny, J. A.; Raskin, D. C.: »Physiological measures and the detection of deception«; in: Psychological Bulletin ; 1977, 84; S. 782-799.
    Poole, D. A.; White, L. T.: »Effects of question repetition and retention interval on the eyewitness testimony of children and adults«; in: Developmental Psychology ; 1991, 27; S. 975- 986.
    Porombka, Stephan: Felix Krulls Erben. Die Geschichte der Hochstapelei im 20. Jahrhundert ; Göttingen: Blumenkamp, 2008.
    Porter, S.; Woodworth, M.; McCabe, S.; Peace, K. A.: »Genius is 1 % inspiration and 99 % perspiration … or is it? An investigation of the impact of motivation and feedback on deception detection«; in: Legal and Criminological Psychology ; 2007, 12; S. 297-310.
    Porter, S.; ten Brinke, L.: »Reading between the lies: Identifying concealed and falsified emotions in universal facial expressions«; in: Psychological Science . 2008, 19 (5); S. 508-514.

    Quas, J. A.; Davids, E. L.; Goodman, G. S.; Myers, J. E. B.: »Repeated questions, deception, and children’s true and false reports of body touch«; in: Child Maltreatment ; 2007, 12; S. 60-67.
    Raskin, D. C. (Hrsg.): Psychological methods for investigation and evidence ; New York: Springer, 1989.
    Raskin, D. C.: »The scientific basis of polygraph techniques and their uses in the judicial process«; in: Reconstructing the past: The role of psychologists in criminal trials ; herausgegeben von A. Trankell; Stockholm: Norstedt & Soners, 1982; S. 319-371.
    Raskin, D. C.; Honts, C. R.: »The comparison question test«; in: Handbook of polygraph testing ; herausgegeben von M. Kleiner; San Diego: Academic Press, 2002; S. 1-47.
    Reddy, V.: »Getting back to the rough ground: Deception and social living«; in: Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London ; 2007.
    Reid, J. E.; Buckle, J. P.; Jayne, B. C.; Inbau, F. E.: Essentials of the Reid Technique: Criminal interrogations and confessions ; Sudbury /MA: Jones & Bartlett, 2004.
    Reis, H. T.; Senchak, M.; Solomon, B.: »Sex-differences in the intimacy of social interaction - further examination of potential explanations«; in: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology ; 1985, 48 (5); S. 1204-1217.
    Riggio, R.; Friedman, H. S.: »Individual differences and cues to deception«; in: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology ; 1983, 45; S. 899-915.
    Robinson, W. P.; Shepherd, A.; Heywood, J.: »Truth, equivocation /concealment, and lies in job applications and doctorpatient communication«; in: Journal of Language and Social Psychology ; 1998, 17; S. 149-164.
    Rosenthal, R.; DePaulo, B. M.: »Sex differences in eavesdropping on nonverbal cues«; in: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology ; 1979, 37; S. 273-285.
    Rotenberg, K. J.; Simourd, L.; Moore, D.: »Children’s use of the verbal-nonverbal consistency principle to infer truth and lying«; in: Child Development ; 1989, 60; S. 309-322.

    Rowatt, W.; Cunningham, M.; Druen, P.: »Deception to get a date«; in: Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin ; 1998, 24; S. 1228- 1244.
    Ruby, C. L.; Brigham, J. C.: »The usefulness of the criteria-based content analysis technique in distinguishing between truthful and fabricated allegations«; in: Psychology, Public Policy & Law ; 1997, 3; S. 705-737.
    Saarni, C.: »Children’s understanding of display rules for expressive behaviour«; in: Developmental Psychology ; 1979, 15; S. 424- 429.
    Sagarin, B. J.; Rhoads, K. v. L.; Cialdini, R. B.: »Deceiver’s distrust: Denigration as a consequence of undiscovered deception«; in: Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin ; 1998, 24; S. 1167- 1176.
    Self, R. (Hrsg.): The Neville Chamberlain diary letters; Volume 4: The Downing Street Years, 1934-40 ; Aldershot: Ashgate, 2005.
    Siegman, A. W.; Reynolds, M. A.: »Self-monitoring and speech in feigned and unfeigned lying«; in: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology ; 1983, 45; S. 1325-1333.
    Sitton, S. C.; Griffin, S. T.: »Detection of deception from clients’ eye contact patterns«; in: Journal of Counseling Psychology ; 1981, 28; S. 269-271.
    Smith, N.: »Reading between the lines: An evaluation of the Scientific Content Analysis technique (SCAN)«; in: Police Research Series Paper 135 ; London: UK Home Office, Research, Development, and Statistics Directorate, Januar 2001.
    Snyder, M.; Cantor, N.: »Testing