Deal!: Du gibst mir, was ich will (German Edition)

estate negotiation . Real estate Review, 25, 48–53.
    Stillenger, C., Epelbaum, M., Keltner, D., & Ross, L. (1990). The »reactive devaluation« barrier to conf lict resolution. Working paper, Stanford University, Palo Alto.
    Strack, F. & Mussweiler, T. (1997). Explaining the enigmatic anchoring effect: Mechanisms of selective accessibility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 437–4 46.
    Strauss, N. (2005). The Game: Penetrating the Secret Society of Pickup Artists. New York: HarperCollins.
    Stuff, B. (2007). Ich liebe dich zu Tode. Berliner Morgenpost, 18. Februar.
    Stuhlmacher, A. & Walters, A. E. (1999). Gender Differences in Negotiation Outcomes: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 52, 653–677.
    Susskind, L., & Cruikshank, J. (1987). Breaking the impasse: Consensual approaches to resolving public disputes. New York: Basic Books.
    Swisher, K. (1998). AOL.com: How Steve Case Beat Bill Gates, Nailed the Netheads, and Made Millions in the War for the Web. New York: Times Business.
    Tajima, M., & Fraser, N. M. (2001). Logrolling procedure for multi-issue negotiation. Group Decision and Negotiation, 10, 217–235.
    Tedeschi, J. T., Schlenker, R. B., & Bonoma, T. V. (1973). Conf lict, Power and Games: The Experimental Study of Interpersonal Relation. Chicago: Aldine.
    Teger, A. (1980). Too much invested to quit. New York: Pergamon Press.
    Tenbergen, R. (2001). Prinzipienorientiertes Verhandeln und das Verhandlungsdilemma – ist das »Harvard-Konzept« zu weich? Thesenpapier präsentiert im Interdisciplinary Research Seminar on Negotiation, Harvard University, im Mai 2001, überarbeitete deutsche Version.
    Tenbrunsel, A. E. (1999). Trust as an obstacle in environmental-economic disputes. American Behavioral Scientist, 42, 1350–1367.
    Tenbrunsel, A. E., Wade-Benzoni, K. A., Moag, J., & Bazerman, M. H. (1999). The Negotiation Matching Process: Relationships and Partner Selection. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 80(3), 252–283.
    Thaler, R. H. (1992). The Winner’s Curse: Paradoxes and Anomalies of Economic Life. New York: Free Press.
    Thompson, L. (1990). Negotiation behaviour and outcomes: Empirical evidence and theoretical issues. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 515–532.
    Thompson, L. A. (1995). They Saw a Negotiation: Partisanship and Involvement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 839–853.
    Thompson, L., & Hastie, R. (1990a). Social perception in negotiation . Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 47, 98–123.
    Thompson, L., & Hastie, R. (1990b). Judgment tasks and biases in negotiation. In B H. Sheppard, M. H. Bazerman, & R. J. Lewicki (Hrsg.), Research on negotiation in organizations (Bd. 2, 31–54). Greenwich, CT.: Jai Press.
    Thompson, L., & Nadler, J. (2002). Negotiating Via Information Technology: Theory and Application. Journal of Social Issues, 58(1), 109–124.
    Thompson, L. L. (2001). The Mind and Heart of the Negotiator. 2. Auf lage. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
    Tinsley, C. H., O’Connor, K. M., & Sullivan, B. A. (2002). Tough guys finish last: The perils of a distributive reputation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 88, 621–642.
    Tomlinson, E., Dinee, B., & Lewicki, R. (2004). The road to reconciliation: Antecedents of victim willingness to reconcile following a broken promise. Journal of Management, 30, 165–187.
    Trump, D. J. (1987). The Art of the Deal. New York: Random House.
    Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185, 1124 –1131.
    Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1986). Rational Choice and the Framing of Decisions. The Journal of Business, University of Chicago Press, 59(4), 251–278.
    Tyler, T. R., & Griffin, E. (1991). The Inf luence of Decision Makers’ Goals on their Concerns About Procedural Justice. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 21, 1629–1658.
    Ury, W. (2007). Getting Past No – Negotiating in Difficult Situations. New York: Random House. (aufgeführt als Ury, Past No)
    Ury, W. (2008). The Power of a Positive No – Save the Deal, Save the Relationship – and Still Say No. New York: Random House. (aufgeführt als Ury, No)
    Ury, W. (2009). Nein sagen und trotzdem erfolgreich verhandeln. Vom Autor des Harvard-Konzepts. Frankfurt am Main: Campus Verlag.
    Valley, K. L., Moag, J., & Bazerman, M. H. (1998). A matter of trust: Effects of communication on the efficiency and distribution of outcomes. Journal of Economic